WRITTEN EVIDENCE

Y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus / Public Accounts Committee PAC(5)-10-17 Paper 4

 

 

 

 

The Public Accounts Committee

 Inquiry into Regional Education Consortia

Tuesday 21 March 2017

 

 

 

1.        The NASUWT welcomes the opportunity to submit written evidence to the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry into Regional Education Consortia.

2.        The NASUWT is the largest teachers’ union in Wales representing teachers and school leaders.

GENERAL COMMENTS

3.        The NASUWT offers the comments and observations which follow on the inquiry into Regional Education Consortia (the Consortia) under scrutiny by the PAC. In particular, the Union will focus on the issues of governance and financial management as well as the openness and transparency of the operation of the four Regional Education Consortia in the context of the Welsh Government’s National model for regional working.[1]

4.        The NASUWT has been involved in discussions and engagement negotiations with the Consortia since their inception. The Union has had a very mixed experience with the four Consortia and believes that there is still a lack of understanding of the role of the Consortia both within the Consortia themselves and amongst teachers and schools.

5.        The NASUWT, as a key stakeholder, has attempted to work closely with the Consortia to ensure that the outcomes of their work are to the benefit of schools and teachers. The Union has sought to initiate true partnership working with the Consortia but has been faced with a lack of understanding of the meaning of partnership. Meetings initially took the form of briefing sessions, with the Consortia simply updating the workforce unions as to their activities.

6.        More recently, the NASUWT experience with the Consortia has become more positive, with their role and the role of the workforce unions being better understood.

7.        Progress has been made with the Education through Regional Working (ERW) Consortium in west and central Wales and the Central South Consortium (CSC) when discussing model policies on pay, performance management and capability procedures for use across the consortium region.

8.        Although the Consortia have responsibility for ensuring the provision of specialist Human Resources (HR) support to schools in accordance with the appendix to the National model for regional working: revitalising people management in schools (Welsh Government Guidance document no: 170/2015),[2]  difficulties remain over the Consortia’s understanding of the role of local authorities as the employers, and that any model policies, regardless of whether or not agreement has been reached at consortium level must then be subject to the normal local authority protocols and procedures.

9.        These processes are less well established and understood in the School Effectiveness and Improvement Service for North Wales (GwE) and the Education Achievement Service (EAS) in south-east Wales. In GwE, these functions remain with the individual local authorities, whilst in EAS there is a south-east Wales grouping of HR officers that sit alongside the Consortium, with some officers taking a dual role. This has, in some cases, led to confusion and delays over responsibility.

10.     Whilst the NASUWT acknowledges that some progress has been made in the engagement with the Consortia over regional working, there remain significant issues regarding the openness, transparency and funding of the Consortia.

SPECIFIC COMMENTS

11.     The NASUWT has experienced considerable difficulty in finding the minutes and reports of meetings, statements of accounts and dates of board meetings of the Consortia and, although each consortium has its own website, there is no consistency in the reporting of meetings and minutes.

12.     The National Model for Regional Working states that:

‘Normally notice of meetings of the joint committee will be given on the consortium’s website and the meetings will be open to the public…’[3]

13.     Dates of meetings and agenda items are available for the CSC Joint Education Service but these are found on the Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council (RCT) website and not on the CSC website. These web pages and documents can only be found easily by using external search engines and not from within the RCT website itself. This information is hosted by RCT as the lead authority in the region; similar information regarding CSC cannot be found on any other websites of the other constituent local authorities.

14.     Likewise, the information about ERW meetings is hosted on the Pembrokeshire County Council’s website. This is, to some extent, replicated on the City and County of Swansea and the Powys County Council websites, but not on those of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council, Carmarthenshire County Council and Ceredigion County Council.

15.     The EAS website contains minutes of board meetings, statements of accounts and the previous year’s business plan but does not include the dates and locations of forthcoming meetings. The company board meetings are not open to the public. Only very limited information regarding EAS can be found on the websites of the constituent local authorities.

16.     Information provided by the Welsh Government to the NASUWT in 2014 showed that the budget for the regional consortia should have been as set out in Table 1.

17.     The NASUWT has found marked discrepancies between these figures and those reported by the individual consortium. The budget for ERW had been set by the Welsh Government at £5.322 million for 2014-15. However, the statement of accounts for ERW put the contributions from member authorities at £267,000.[4]

18.     ERW’s business plan for 2017-19 states that the total income from the constituent local authorities amounts to £250,000 and their total funding including Welsh Government grant funding is £500,000. This is at odds with the Wales Audit Office Memorandum for the Public Accounts Committee – Achieving improvement in support to schools through regional education consortia – a review of progress, November 2016, which states:

‘…the core budgets for the four consortia in 2014-15 were approximately £18.5 million…’ [5]

 

 

 

 

Table 1

 

Required local authority minimum contributions for 2014-15, based on the 2014-15 mainstream schools SSA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SSA Formula

 

Region

 Local Authority

 

2014-15 Mainstream Schools Sector distribution

Percentage distribution

North Wales

Isle of Anglesey

 

422,621

2.3%

Gwynedd

 

740,733

4.0%

Conwy

 

652,994

3.5%

Denbighshire

 

623,793

3.4%

Flintshire

 

933,484

5.0%

Wrexham

 

782,631

4.2%

Sub total

 

4,156,256

22.4%

 

 

 

 

 

ERW

Powys

 

786,048

4.2%

Ceredigion

 

414,511

2.2%

Pembrokeshire

 

759,950

4.1%

Carmarthenshire

 

1,141,069

6.2%

Swansea

 

1,370,773

7.4%

Neath Port Talbot

 

850,288

4.6%

Sub total

 

5,322,639

28.7%

 

 

 

 

Central South

Bridgend

 

862,092

4.6%

The Vale of Glamorgan

 

799,973

4.3%

Rhondda Cynon Taf

 

1,531,657

8.3%

Merthyr Tydfil

 

359,863

1.9%

Cardiff

 

1,917,619

10.3%

Sub total

 

5,471,204

29.5%

 

 

 

 

 

South East

Caerphilly

 

1,169,666

6.3%

Blaenau Gwent

 

417,511

2.3%

Torfaen

 

600,536

3.2%

Monmouthshire

 

481,642

2.6%

Newport

 

934,254

5.0%

Sub total

 

3,603,609

19.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wales

 

18,553,708

100.0%

 

19.     By contrast, the CSC Budget for 2016-17 sets the local authority contributions at £4.195 million.[6]

20.     The Regional Education Consortia also receive grant funding from the Welsh Government. Part of this money can be kept by the Consortia for administrative purposes and to finance their own activities. The remaining amount of money, which represents the large majority, is delegated to schools. However, in none of the reports that the NASUWT has found on any of the Consortia are these amounts broken down with sufficient clarity to provide the whole picture of the funding of the Consortia.

21.     As stated previously, the NASUWT has experienced considerable difficulty in accessing the reports and budgets of the Consortia. These are not published by StatsWales in the same way that school budgets and local authority finance is reported. The information is difficult to find, inconsistent and opaque.

22.     Over the period of 2013 to 2016 StatsWales has reported the Education revenue expenditure, by authority and service.[7]

23.     This shows that the total amount spent by local authorities on school improvement has fallen from £54.137 million in 2013-14 to £44.174 million in 2015-16 (Table 2 below).

24.     The changes to individual local authority spends are also marked, with Conwy County Borough Council increasing their spend by 115% whereas the Isle of Anglesey County Council has reduced theirs by 85%.

25.     The NASUWT maintains that the changes and variations in spending are very difficult to understand in the context of the work of the Consortia. In particular, the figures for the ERW region do not shed any further light on the funding arrangements in that area. It may be that the comments from the Auditor General for Wales in the June 2015 report, Achieving improvement in support to schools through regional education consortia, provides some explanation:

‘We found that many local authorities have ceased to have ‘head of school improvement’ posts during 2011-13 but have since re-instated similar roles to provide the local authority with a lead officer to interact with the relevant senior or principal challenge adviser for the consortium.’[8]

Table 2

Education revenue expenditure, by authority and service 2013-2016

 

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2013 to 2016

Local Authorities

Total School improvement

Total School improvement

Total School improvement

Change

% Change

 

£ ,000s

£ ,000s

£ ,000s

£ ,000s

 

Isle of Anglesey

1318

1066

202

-1116

-85

Gwynedd

1596

2444

1296

-300

-19

Conwy

626

1409

1348

722

115

Denbighshire

2713

2558

2763

50

2

Flintshire

3360

2243

2625

-735

-22

Wrexham

967

1553

1762

795

82

GwE Total

10580

11274

9996

-584

-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

Powys

5217

5442

2225

-2992

-57

Ceredigion

3184

2892

2033

-1151

-36

Pembrokeshire

1086

1255

1344

258

24

Carmarthenshire

3372

3247

1988

-1384

-41

Swansea

2970

2026

2242

-728

-25

Neath Port Talbot

7251

7921

8353

1103

15

ERW Total

23079

22783

18186

-4893

-21

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bridgend

1307

1128

1092

-215

-16

Vale of Glamorgan

913

1458

942

29

3

Rhondda Cynon Taf

3012

3145

3031

19

1

Merthyr Tydfil

973

97

458

-515

-53

Cardiff

2723

2286

2002

-721

-26

CSC Total

8929

8114

7525

-1404

-16

 

 

 

 

 

 

Caerphilly

6615

6381

5179

-1436

-22

Blaenau Gwent

1382

960

685

-697

-50

Torfaen

1135

995

680

-455

-40

Monmouthshire

1350

1095

1086

-264

-20

Newport

1067

936

837

-230

-22

EAS Total

11550

10367

8467

-3082

-27

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Unitary Authorities

54137

52537

44174

-9963

-18

 

26.     The NASUWT firmly believes that much more needs to be done to improve the openness and transparency of the workings of Regional Education Consortia and that lessons must be learnt before this model is extended to other local authority services.

27.     The NASUWT does not accept the assertion of the Welsh Ministers that the Regional Education Consortia model presents a good example of collaborative working between local authorities.

 

Rex Phillips

National Official for Wales

 

 

For further information on this written evidence, contact Rex Phillips, National Official for Wales.

NASUWT Cymru

Greenwood Close

Cardiff Gate Business Park

Cardiff

CF23 8RD

029 2054 6080

www.nasuwt.org.uk

nasuwt@mail.nasuwt.org.uk



[1] http://gov.wales/docs/dcells/publications/140217-national-model-for-regional-working-en-v2.pdf

 

[2] http://gov.wales/docs/dcells/publications/150424-national-model-for-regional-working-en.pdf

 

 

[3] Ibid

[4] Education through Regional Working Statement of Accounts 2014/2015

https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/objview.asp?object_id=12247&language=

[5] https://www.wao.gov.uk/system/files/publications/Reg-education-review-memo-2016-english.pdf

 

[6] Central South Consortium report for Joint Committee 14th March 2017

http://www.rctcbc.gov.uk/EN/Council/CouncillorsCommitteesandMeetings/Meetings/CentralSouthConsortiumJointEducationService/2017/03/14/Reports/AgendaItem5ReportoftheTreasurer.pdf

 

[7] https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/Local-Government/Finance/Revenue/Education/educationrevenueexpenditure-by-authority-service

 

[8]https://www.audit.wales/system/files/publications/regional_education_consortia_report_english.pdf